property owner Archives

Do you have a right to recover attorney’s fees in partition actions? (CCP § 874.020)

Published on: July 20, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-1-2-300x300 Yes. In California, you have a right to recover attorney’s fees by statute. But that doesn’t mean that you can recover 100% of your fees, even in uncontested partitions. Courts will employ numerous equitable considerations in awarding costs, and the complexities of prolonged litigation may render some expenditures on your attorney unrecoverable. The focus of this blog post will therefore be those common issues that arise when attempting to recoup your costs.

The Authority for Awarding Attorney’s Fees in Partition Actions

Code of Civil Procedure, section 874.010 states that “[t]he costs of partition include: (a) [r]easonable attorney’s fees incurred or paid by a party for the common benefit.”

Continue reading →

What is the difference Between Tenants in Common and Joint Tenants? (Code of Civil Procedure section 683)

Published on: July 13, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-1-300x300 In California, most real estate is held either as marital property, as a tenancy in partnership, as joint tenants, or as tenants-in-common. While holding titles as spouses or in a partnership is relatively straightforward, questions frequently arise as to the differences between “co-tenants” and “tenants-in-common.” This article will explore the difference between the second type of ways of holding titles between unmarried individuals, which is generally known as “co-tenancy.” (Civ. Code § 682.)

How is a joint tenancy created in real estate?

Generally, creating and maintaining a joint tenancy is much more difficult than creating a tenancy in common. First, a joint tenancy exists only when the “four unities” are concurrently present in the estate: the unity of interest, unity of time, unity of title, and unity of possession. (Tenhet, 18 Cal.3d 150, 155.) Second, by statute, a joint tenancy exists “when expressly declared in the will or transferred to be a joint tenancy.” (CCP § 683.)

Continue reading →

Can You Partition Partnership Property? (Corp. Code § 16202)

Published on: July 8, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-1-1-300x300 Yes. Partnership property is subject to partition on the dissolution, accounting, and wind-up of partnership matters, just like other types of property. As real estate presents unique issues, however, there are many important things to know about the process to ensure that it is done correctly. The purpose of this blog post is to address some of the issues involved with partitioning property belonging to a partnership.

What is a Partnership?

Partnerships are a type of corporate entity with its own set of rules and regulations. By code, a partnership is born by the association of two or more individuals to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit, whether or not the persons intended to form a partnership. (Corp. Code § 16202.)

Continue reading →

Can I get compensated for improvements in a partition action (IE- upgrades)? (Code of Civil Procedure section 874.010)

Published on: July 6, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-2-300x300 Yes. A party may be able to receive credits and/or offsets for upgrading a property in a partition action under many circumstances. In a partition lawsuit, two parties disagree about what to do with the jointly-owned property.

In those circumstances, one party can seek the sale of the property and then have the equity divided between all of the owners. Once the property is sold, the parties can make claims to the money left from the proceeds from the house.

One issue that often arises, however, is whether an improvement to the property—as opposed to a repair—is subject to an offset as part of the partition action. For example, if one party remodels a bathroom, would they have the right to an offset for that work?

Continue reading →

Can a property owner testify as to the value of their property in eminent domain? (CCP § 1260.210)

Published on: June 28, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

A lawyer holding her gravel with documents on her desks and beside her is someone holding lots of money.
Yes. But it is a complex affair. Eminent Domain proceedings take on a unique structure with expert testimony as the backbone for the determination of fair market value. Neither side of the litigation has the burden of proof on this issue of just compensation, and unlike the traditional civil court case, the Defendant presents their evidence first. (Code. Civ. Proc. § 1260.210.)

Additionally, judges will often place limits on what a homeowner may testify to and can screen the witness beforehand to ensure that they’ll be employing a valid methodology on the stand. Taken as a whole, the process can be quite daunting to the layperson. This post will therefore look at the common issues and questions which arise regarding testimony in eminent domain.

The Importance of Testimony in Eminent Domain Proceedings

Continue reading →

How does a partition by private sale work? (CCP § 872.720)

Published on: June 24, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

A lawyer writing on a paperwork on his desk in front of his client. Partition by a private sale is a method of selling jointly owned property, either by joint tenants or tenants in common, under the court’s supervision via a court order or a court-ordered referee.

What is a partition lawsuit?

A partition action or a partition lawsuit is when one co-owner, or when one person with interest in the property wants to sell the property, but the other co-owners or others with interest in the property do not want to sell their ownership rights.

Continue reading →

What is the difference between a receiver and a partition referee? (CCP § 873.610)

Published on: June 20, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Two lawyers having an agreement and signing a paperwork. Partition receivers and partition referees serve very similar roles in partition lawsuits. Their roles are to act as a third party with no ties to any of the co-owners interests in property via a partition lawsuit and to help the court and the judge to distribute the property or proceeds from the sale of the property fairly and equitably. Read on to find out the important differences between the two.

What is a receiver?

A receiver, on occasion, assists the co-owners of the property, and the court in achieving a successful sale or appraisal for the property is partitioned. Receivers are court-appointed in California that oversees actions such as business disputes, divorce cases, judgment collection, and of course, real estate partition cases.

Continue reading →

How does a court make an accounting when a property is partitioned by division? (CCP § 873.250)

Published on: June 17, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

A lawyer on his desk signing a document. When there is a court-ordered partition by division, there are several steps that both the court and parties take to ensure that the property is physically divided both equally and equitably. Read on to find out the different avenues the court takes when deciding a partition by division lawsuit.

How does the Court Account for partition by Division?

First, the court operates on the assumed guideline that all parties should have the property divided in the most equal and equitable ways possible. The court in the Canepari v. Pascale court case found that there is a rebuttable presumption that the partitioned property should be equally divided. This means that if each co-owner or tenant holds a 50 percent interest in the property, then the property in question is divided as physically possible to a 50/50 divide.

Continue reading →

Can a guarantor in the property sue for partition?

Published on: June 3, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

An unbalanced scale on a desk Unless the guarantor has an interest in the property, such as a joint tenancy, tenancy in common, or tenancy by the entirety, then no, a guarantor in the property can not sue for partition.

This seems complicated, but if you break down that a guarantor simply acts as collateral against a property mortgage, and those who are eligible to bring a partition action lawsuit must have an actual interest in the property, it starts to make more sense. Read on to find out more about how these two concepts interact in the world of real estate law.

What is a guarantor?

Continue reading →

Can a third party be joined in a family law proceeding to sell a property?

Published on: May 30, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Yes, a third party who has an interest in the property in question may “join” in a family law proceeding. In some specific cases, a third party must “join” the family law proceeding.

California codified a third party’s ability to participate in a family law proceeding to assert their interest in real estate by creating the joinder rules. These rules authorize who is allowed to join a family law proceeding other than the two spouses.

Who can join a family law proceeding?

Continue reading →