Item: Underwood Law Firm, P.C.
Rating: 5
Author: I.S.

Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) Section 873.140 - Referee Appointed Auctioneer

Code of Civil Procedure section 873.140 allows the referee to hire an auctioneer. This statute is important because the referee may have to hire an auctioneer to oversee the property’s sale if it is sold through auction.

Code of Civil Procedure section 873.140 states:

The referee may, with the approval of the court pursuant to Section 873.110, employ an auctioneer, authorized to act as such in the locality, to conduct a public auction and to secure purchasers by such method for any property to be sold at public auction.

(Amended by Stats. 1976, c. 73, p. 110, § 6.)

What Is an Example?

“Shawn” and “Julie” are an unmarried couple. They decide to buy a home as joint tenants and move in together.

Unfortunately, Shawn and Julie’s relationship doesn’t work out, and they break up. They cannot agree on what to do with the property. Shawn wants to sell the home and move on, so he sues for partition by sale.

The court orders the property to be sold and the sale proceeds distributed. The court appoints a referee to oversee the sale. After some investigation, the referee recommends that the property is sold through a public auction.

To manage the public auction, the referee wishes to hire an auctioneer. Pursuant to CCP § 873.140, the court approves the auctioneer. With this, the auctioneer can conduct the public auction of the property.

Law Revision Commission Comments (CCP § 873.140)

1976 Addition

Section 873.140 is new. It is derived from Probate Code Section 760.5 (sale of tangible personal property of estate).

Assembly Committee Comments

As is the case for most of the partition statutes, section 873.140 does not include a an “official” Assembly Committee Comment from the California Legislature. But this is because the Legislature endorsed an overall adoption of the Law Revision Commission suggestions when it passed the new partition statutes in 1976.

In fact, the introduction to Assembly Bill 1671 (the bill that contained the new partition laws) states that the Revision Commission’s recommendations “reflect the intent of the Assembly Committee… in approving the various provisions of Assembly Bill 1671.” This demonstrates that the intent of the Legislature was substantially in line with that of the Revision Commission.

As to comment, it references Probate Code section 760.5. But that provision was repealed in 1987. Now, the operative version of that former statute is Probate Code section 10151.

That version of the statute clarifies that “authorized to operate as such in the locality” language (also found in CCP § 873.140) is archaic. Instead, the auctioneer must merely be licensed under the Auctioneer and Auctioneering Licensing Act (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 5700-5791.5.)

In addition, if the auctioneer is to be paid by the sales proceeds, the amount paid shall be the amount the court, in its discretion, determines to be a reasonable compensation for the services of the auctioneer. (Prob. Code § 10167.) Similarly with a partition, it is doubtful that the court would permit an auctioneer to take out of the sales proceeds at an unreasonable rate of compensation.

★★★★★

“We were in need of a real estate attorney. Eli Underwood provided excellent legal advice and services. He explained everything well and followed through with all important issues that needed attention. We found him to be reliable, courteous, patient and extremely professional. We highly recommend Mr. Underwood without any reservations.” I.S.

"I own a real estate investment company that operates across multiple states (California, Washington, Oregon, Montana, and more), whenever I run into an issue that needs legal attention, Eli is my first call. I've been working with him for years. He is an amazing attorney and I highly recommend him." Thank you for your help Sir!" T.W.

"Mr. Underwood is a fantastic Lawyer with extraordinary ethics. He responds quickly, which is rare these days, and he is very knowledgeable in his craft. It was a pleasure working with him and we will definitely use his services in the future if needed. Thank you for your help Sir!" M.O.

"Eli took our case and controlled every hurdle put before us. I one time commented to him that he must love his job because it seemed that he was always available. When talking about my case to anyone I always bring up where, I believe, the other parties Lawyer tried to take advantage of my wife and me. Eli stopped him in his tracks. On top of it being easy to work with Eli, it was a pleasure to have had him represent us. We were in good hands." E.T

"We were in need of an attorney with considerable knowledge of real estate law and the legal issues related to property ownership. Eli Underwood went above and beyond our expectations. In keeping us abreast of our suit, his communication skills were outstanding. This talent was especially demonstrated when dealing with the apposing counsel. We feel this gave us a tremendous advantage over the opposing party that resulted in us reaching a successful outcome. I would highly recommend Eli Underwood as we found him to be an exceptional attorney." P.B.

"In our need for legal services we found Eli to be well informed and on top of our case and our needs. Our's was not an ordinary case as it was a case with many facets. It was a very convoluted case. There were multiple owners involved in a property dispute where one of the owners sued the rest of the owners with a Partition Suit. Needless to say Eli was instrumental in helping us resolve our differences and gained us a profitable sale all with good end results for all. If you hire Eli Underwood you will not be disappointed!" M.A.

Submit a Law Firm Client Review