partition Archives

Can a trustee file a partition action? (Prob. Code § 16226.)

Published on: November 11, 2024 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

underwood-trustee-partition-action-300x300 A trust set up for property gives beneficiaries a right to the property once the settlor has passed away. This means beneficiaries may become co-owners. However, the trustee may also hold an interest in the property as well. If the trustee is a co-owner of the property, they can file a partition suit. This is important if you are interested in filing a partition suit either as a trustee or co-owner of a property where the trustee holds an interest.

How can a trustee hold an interest in the property?

The trustor creates the trust and places the asset or property into the trust to be held and transferred. The benefit of the trust will be passed to the beneficiaries upon death. These beneficiaries receive the assets like property once certain conditions occur. For example, following the death of the trustor. The trustee will manage the trust and ensure it is carried out according to the trustor’s wishes. A trustee can be a beneficiary but, the trustee typically holds the property for the benefit of another. (Estate of Yool (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 867, 874.) This may impact future rights and interests in property, so the right to partition will only be upheld if it is in the best interest of the parties. (CCP § 872.710.)

Continue reading →

Can a Co-Owner Recover Value of Time or Services in a Partition Action?

Published on: September 11, 2024 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

underwood-recover-value-time-services-300x300 The purpose of this article is to explain whether a property owner can recover value of time or services in a partition action. Understanding whether an owner can recover the value of time or services is important because it directly affects the compensation they are entitled to recover in a partition action.

What is a partition action?

A partition action is a court-ordered process that occurs when a property owner forces the sale of jointly owned real estate property. Partitions are designed to determine the final equitable sum of a property owner’s interest in real estate, allowing each co-worker to take their fair share of equity, before going their separate ways. Each owner is entitled to recover their fair share of the property’s value. This means each co-owner is guaranteed to receive their equal share of rents and profits from a property they co-own through an equal division process performed by the court. (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 872.510.)

Continue reading →

Is It Possible to Bring a Partition Action in Federal Court?

Published on: August 28, 2024 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

underwood-partition-federal-court-300x300 The purpose of this article is to explain how a partition action could be brought in federal court. While it is possible to bring a partition action in a federal court, because of how state-specific partition statutes are, partition matters are usually handled in state courts.

Generally, partition actions are governed by state statutes. Also, a claim for partition is usually resolved by equitable remedies, meaning the court follows equitable principles. (Elbert, Ltd. v. Federated Income Properties (1953) 120 Cal. App. 2d 194, 200.) This means protecting the rights of co-tenants or owners and determining rights in a fair way. The jurisdiction to handle a partition claim and determine equitable remedies is granted by a state constitution or by state or federal statutes.

These state statutes give state courts jurisdiction to handle partition claims alongside other real estate issues. For example, in California, the California Code of Civil Procedure section 872.110 gives state superior courts jurisdiction to handle partition matters.

Continue reading →

Partitions of Spousal Property with Third Parties (Fam. Code § 2021)

Published on: January 4, 2024 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

underwood-partition-spousal-property-third-parties-300x300 Family Code section 2021 provides that a court “may order that a person who claims an interest in the proceeding be joined as a party” to nullity, dissolution, and legal separation proceedings. (Fam.C. § 2021(a).) An interested third party may wish to join a family law proceeding, or an existing party may want to join the interested individual. An existing party may request that the court join the third party if the third party possesses or claims to own property that the court has jurisdiction over in the proceeding. (Cal. Rules of Court 5.24(c)(1).) Additionally, a third party may request to be joined if they have been served a temporary restraining order that affects their ability to use property they possess or claim to own.

When will courts order joinder in Family Law?

When a claimant has a property interest at stake and is requested to be joined, the court has the discretion to decide whether the claimant will be joined as a party. (Schnabel v. Superior Court (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 758, 762-63.) In other words, the court is allowed to deny a request for joinder even if the individual seeking it has a legitimate interest in the proceeding. This is called a “permissive” joinder. Joinders are mandatory only when the party sought to be joined has or claims physical custody or visitation of a minor child involved in the family law proceeding. (Cal. Rules of Court 5.24(e)(1).)

Continue reading →

Law.com recognizes Underwood Law Firm as Leading Partition Firm

Published on: December 22, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

underwood-law-com-recognizes-partition-firm-300x300 Underwood Law Firm is a finalist for the California Legal Awards’ Vanguard Award.

Featured on Law.com

Underwood Law Firm is a finalist for the California Legal Awards’ Vanguard Award, honoring firms and companies that have revolutionized their business to stay one step ahead of the current and future forces shaping the legal industry.

Continue reading →

The Complete Guide to the Partition of Real Property Act (Part 5)

Published on: December 1, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

What if parties do not appear in a lawsuit requesting partition in kind under the Partition of Real Property Act?

underwood-partition-real-property-guide-part-5-300x300 Just as there are special provisions for defaulting parties with partitions by sale, so too are there unique rules where some defendants fail to appear in a partition in kind action.

The text of the statute provides that, “if the court orders a partition in kind, the court shall allocate to the cotenants that are unknown, unlocatable, or the subject of a default judgment… a part of the property representing the combined interests of these cotenants as determined by the court.” (CCP § 874.318 (d).)

Continue reading →

The Complete Guide to the Partition of Real Property Act (Part 4)

Published on: November 26, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

underwood-partition-real-property-guide-part-4-300x300 This is a continuation of our ongoing series on the Complete Guide to the Partition of Real Property Act. For complete comprehension, we would suggest starting from the beginning.

As a quick summary, the Partition of Real Property Act is a law specific to California, passed in July 2022. (Stats 2022 Ch. 82 § 3 (AB 2245).) It brought significant changes to how partitions are conducted in the state, if the underlying parties are tenants in common. But even though the act is particular to California, it is actually derived from the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (“UPHPA”).

Because of the similarity between the laws, and in order to deliver the most comprehensive understanding of the Partition of Real Property Act, this guide references law review notes, statutes, and appellate decisions from other states interpreting the UPHPA.

Continue reading →

How Does a Lender Respond to a Partition Action (Civ. Code § 2924l) [With Form]

Published on: November 22, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

underwood-how-does-lender-respond-partition-action-300x300 A declaration of non-monetary status is a special type of court filing reserved for trustees under a deed of trust. These trustees have limited powers, but are often named as defendants in lawsuits by plaintiffs seeking to ensure proper joinder.

Of course, being named in a complaint carries with it several responsibilities, chief among these being that every defendant must issue a responsive pleading, such as an answer. For the trustee included purely as a precautionary measure, this is frustrating. Not only will they need to file an answer, which is both costly and time consuming, but they will also consistently be served with court documents in a case they have no interest in litigating.

To get around this hassle, trustees may file a declaration of non-monetary status, provided the relevant deed of trust is the “subject” of a lawsuit. Successfully filing this declaration means that the trustee no longer needs to participate in the lawsuit, provided the trustee also agrees to be bound by any court order relating to the subject deed of trust.

Continue reading →

The Complete Guide to the Partition of Real Property Act (Part 3)

Published on: November 17, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

How does the court appraise the property (CCP § 874.316)?

As was noted previously, the court shall order an appraisal of the property once it determines that the parties are entitled to partition. (CCP § 874.316.) But how does that appraisal process work?

Once the court orders the appraisal, it needs to appoint a disinterested and licensed appraiser to value the property as if only one person owned it. This is because properties with multiple ownership interests typically sell for less. Once the appraisal is complete, the appraiser must file it with the court. After this is done, the court must conduct a hearing to determine the property’s fair market value 30 days after notice of the appraisal is sent to each party. (CCP § 874.316 (f).)

Continue reading →

The Complete Guide to the Partition of Real Property Act (Part 2)

Published on: November 10, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

When does the Partition of Real Property Act apply (CCP § 874.313)?

underwood-partition-real-property-guide-part-2-300x300 As noted previously, the Partition of Real Property Act applies to real property held in tenancy in common where there is no agreement in a record binding all the co-owners related to partition. (CCP § 874.311.) But does that mean its provisions are mandatory in such situations? Case law and legislative history suggest the answer to that question is “yes.”

For one, the Code states that the property “shall” be partitioned under the Partition of Real Property Act unless all of the cotenants (including the defendants to the action) otherwise agree. (CCP § 874.313.) This mirrors the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act, which provides that if the property is heirs property, “the property must be partitioned under this act unless all of the cotenants otherwise agree in a record.”

Continue reading →