Multiple owners Archives

What is an Accounting Action (CCP § 872.140)?

Published on: February 22, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

2222023-300x300 An action for accounting is an equitable action seeking to determine the amount owed to the parties of an action when damages are uncertain. “An accounting is an equitable proceeding which is proper where there is an unliquidated and unascertained amount owing that cannot be determined without an examination of the debits and credits on the books to determine what is due and owing.” (Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 1105, 1136-1137, 167 Cal.Rptr.3d 382.) Therefore, when asserting an accounting action, equitable principles apply.

In order to prevail on an accounting claim, a party must prove the existence of a relationship and that an uncertain balance is owed to the plaintiff, which requires an accounting. At the Underwood Law Firm, our attorneys are more than familiar with accounting actions.

Elements of an Accounting Action

Continue reading →

What is a Marvin Agreement (Marvin v. Marvin (1976) 18 Cal.3d 660)?

Published on: February 15, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

2152023-300x300 A Marvin agreement is an implied or express contract made between two nonmarried cohabitants/partners regarding property rights during a romantic relationship. Generally, unmarried partners living together can enter a variety of contracts, including but not limited to pooling their earnings to share property equally, holding property as joint tenants or tenants in common, or keeping their earnings and property separate. (Marvin v. Marvin (1976) 18 Cal.3d 660, 674; Hill v. Westbrook’s Estate (1950) 95 Cal.App.2d 599; Della Zoppa v. Della Zoppa (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 1144.) If established, a Marvin agreement gives property rights to a romantic partner similar to that of a married individual. As such, a Marvin claim works similarly to a breach of contract claim but is ultimately based on equity.

In order to prevail on a Marvin claim, a party must prove that an agreement existed between nonromantic partners to treat the property as theirs together. At Underwood Law Firm, our attorneys are more than familiar with Marvin agreements and their relationship with property rights.

Where do Marvin Agreements come from?

Continue reading →

What is a Deed of Trust? (CCP § 2924)

Published on: February 10, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-2-300x300 A deed of trust is a commonly used mortgage document in California. Essentially, a deed of trust provides a lender with security for the repayment of the loan and effectively functions similarly to a mortgage. A deed of trust is a deed that transfers a legal interest in a piece of real property owned by the lendee to the lender, or trustee, in order to secure the debt owed on the loan. Certain elements are required for a deed of trust to be valid. These elements are codified in the Code of Civil Procedure, section 2924.

A deed of trust involves three parties: (1) the trustor, who is the person who received the loan, (2) the beneficiary, who is the person who loaned the money to the trustor, and (3) the trustee, who is the person that released the loan once it has been paid off. At Underwood Law Firm, our attorneys are more than familiar with a deed of trust and the elements required for a valid deed of trust.

When is it common to have a Deed of Trust?

Continue reading →

What is a TIC Agreement (Kapner v. Meadowland Ranch Assn. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 1182)

Published on: February 8, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-1-1-300x300 A “TIC” Agreement is a contractual agreement between tenants in common to real property. Because each tenant in common is a co-owner of the property, these agreements can help spell out the rights of each, preventing future disputes over payment or occupation. And, if the dispute cannot be prevented, the agreement, acting as a binding contract, provides a clear guideline for a judge to use in a court action, ensuring that the lawsuit moves along as quickly as possible.

That being said, an imperfect TIC agreement can wind up doing more harm than good in certain situations. If it fails to include a partition waiver, for example, one co-owner can actually attempt to force a sale of the entire property outright.

As such, it is important for any prospective co-owner of real property to choose the right attorney for the job. At Underwood Law Firm, our attorneys are well-versed in the law of co-ownership, and we know the best ways to tackle the disputes that accompany it. Our team has the legal acumen and skills necessary to help you achieve your ownership goals.

Continue reading →

What happens when a co-owner refuses to pay their share of the mortgage? ((Wallace v. Daley (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 1028.)

Published on: February 1, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-300x300
In California, cotenants are obligated to pay for their portion of common costs. A huge part of owning property jointly is “splitting the bill,” so to speak. From Property taxes to mortgage payments to utilities, the list goes on and on in terms of what all cotenants are responsible for. But that does not mean that each co-owner has to pay an equal share, or always does. And not every property-related expense is one which every cotenant must share in.

Perhaps due to all these various rules and unforeseen responsibilities, joint-ownership arrangements can often fall apart. All it takes is one delinquent mortgage payment to crater the credit scores of all parties involved. In these situations, a co-owner’s best option is a partition action where they can recover their share of overpayments. The Underwood Law Firm is familiar with these matters, and our team has the legal acumen and skills necessary to help you with the process.

What are common costs?

Continue reading →

What is a Motion to Determine Title in a Quiet Title Action? (CCP § 760.030)

Published on: January 25, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-1-2-300x300 A motion to determine title is a motion to the court requesting that the court establish title to a piece of real property. Typically, a motion to determine title shows up in the court as a quiet title action. A quiet title action is brought when a litigant seeks to establish that they have an ownership interest in the subject property and refute any adverse claims against the litigant. It follows that to prevail on a motion to determine title; one must show that they hold some ownership interest in the subject property.

The law surrounding a motion to determine title is codified in Code of Civil Procedure section 760.030. Under section 760.030, when establishing or quieting title is in issue in an action or proceeding, the court may, upon motion of any party, require that the issue be resolved pursuant to the provisions of the code of civil procedure relating to quiet title actions. (CCP § 760.030.) At Underwood Law Firm, our attorneys are more than familiar with partition actions and the step-by-step process of pursuing a partition.

What is a Quiet Title Action

Continue reading →

Can Guardians or Conservators file partition claims? (CCP § 872.710(c))

Published on: January 20, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-3-1-300x300 Yes, but only in specific circumstances. When thinking of lawsuits, most people associate them with individuals. John may sue Mary for battery, for example. But this isn’t always the case. A large part of the law is devoted to virtual representation because some people, like minors, simply cannot file suit.

This is where guardians and conservators come into play. These are officers that can be appointed or approved by the court and whose sole responsibility is the management of a person or thing on their behalf. Commonly, we associate conservators with property and guardians with people, but the differences are, in actuality, quite minute.

Partitions are lawsuits that seek to divide up the shared equity in a property. But what happens when one of the owners is a minor or so elderly that they cannot manage the property on their own? At Underwood Law Firm, we have the answers. Our attorneys are more than familiar with partitions and the complexities such lawsuits can entail, particularly when conservatorships or trusts are involved. With our attorneys at your side, you can be sure that we will best assist you in achieving your litigation objectives.

Continue reading →

Are Tenant-in-Common Agreements Constitutional? (Tom v. City and County of San Francisco (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 674.)

Published on: January 11, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-3-300x300 Co-ownership of property brings with it many rights and duties under the law. These rights and duties can vary depending on whether co-owners hold property as tenants in common or joint tenants; these are the two most popular forms of joint ownership in the state. Regardless of the ownership scheme, however, both forms of cotenancy share the same indisputable right: the right of possession. (Bakanauskas v. Urdan (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 621, 628-630.)

The right to possession is straightforward. Whether a co-owner holds a 1% or 99% ownership interest, they are nonetheless entitled to occupy the whole of the property if they so choose. (Dabney v. Dabney (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 379, 382.) Of course, the “right” often does not meet the practicalities of the situation. To that end, co-owners have developed “TIC” agreements, wherein they agree to limit their right to occupy the jointly owned premises.

TIC agreements, too, seem straightforward enough, but they became the subject of controversy when used with rental properties. Due to California’s skyrocketing housing costs, some co-owners of rental units enacted TICs amongst themselves so that each could have the exclusive right to occupancy (ERO) in particular dwelling units within the rental property.

Continue reading →

Is there a Statute of Limitations on Partition Actions? (CCP § 318)

Published on: January 4, 2023 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-1-300x300 In most cases, no. Instead, the statute of limitations most frequently bars a partition action when a party’s rights to the property have lapsed due to an ouster.

What is a Partition Action?

A partition action is an action brought by a co-owner of a piece of real property against another co-owner, seeking to divide the property according to the respective interests of the co-owners. Typically, a property is partitioned in one of two ways. A partition by sale, where the subject property is sold, and the proceeds of the sale are split according to the respective interests of the titleholders. A physical partition physically divides the subject property into separate parcels in accordance with the respective interests.

Continue reading →

A Guide to California Joint Tenancy (Milian v. De Leon (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 1185)

Published on: December 23, 2022 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Underwood-Blog-Images-4-300x300 “Joint tenancy” is a phrase that most people associate with the co-ownership of a property. And indeed, this is correct. Joint tenancy is a form of co-ownership in California, second only to tenancies-in-common in terms of popularity. But just because the words “joint tenancy” are used in a deed or other property-related document does not mean one actually exists.

For a joint tenancy to be “true” means its effects fully apply. At a minimum, ownership percentages between the owners need to be equal, and the right of survivorship has to be present between the parties. What’s more, is that if any of the statutory or legal requirements associated with its creation are missing, then the joint tenancy does not exist, and it cannot be “true.”

At Underwood Law Firm, our attorneys are well-versed in co-tenancy and the various forms it can take, including joint tenancy. The rights and duties that follow each of these ownership schemes are unique, making them a key issue in real estate litigation.

Continue reading →