In California, most real estate is held either as marital property, as a tenancy in partnership, as joint tenants, or as tenants-in-common. While holding titles as spouses or in a partnership is relatively straightforward, questions frequently arise as to the differences between “co-tenants” and “tenants-in-common.” This article will explore the difference between the second type…
Continue reading ›Yes. Partnership property is subject to partition on the dissolution, accounting, and wind-up of partnership matters, just like other types of property. As real estate presents unique issues, however, there are many important things to know about the process to ensure that it is done correctly. The purpose of this blog post is to address…
Continue reading ›Yes. A party may be able to receive credits and/or offsets for upgrading a property in a partition action under many circumstances. In a partition lawsuit, two parties disagree about what to do with the jointly-owned property. In those circumstances, one party can seek the sale of the property and then have the equity divided…
Continue reading ›Yes. But it is a complex affair. Eminent Domain proceedings take on a unique structure with expert testimony as the backbone for the determination of fair market value. Neither side of the litigation has the burden of proof on this issue of just compensation, and unlike the traditional civil court case, the Defendant presents their…
Continue reading ›Partition by a private sale is a method of selling jointly owned property, either by joint tenants or tenants in common, under the court’s supervision via a court order or a court-ordered referee. What is a partition lawsuit? A partition action or a partition lawsuit is when one co-owner, or when one person with interest…
Continue reading ›Receivers and partitions referees are cut from the same cloth. In actions involving property, they step in at the request of the parties or order of the court to properly dispose of or manage the property at issue. Their roles are to act as a third party with no ties to any of the co-owners…
Continue reading ›When there is a court-ordered partition by division, there are several steps that both the court and parties take to ensure that the property is physically divided both equally and equitably. Read on to find out the different avenues the court takes when deciding a partition by division lawsuit. How does the Court Account for…
Continue reading ›Unless the guarantor has an interest in the property, such as a joint tenancy, tenancy in common, or tenancy by the entirety, then no, a guarantor in the property can not sue for partition. This seems complicated, but if you break down that a guarantor simply acts as collateral against a property mortgage, and those…
Continue reading ›Yes, a third party who has an interest in the property in question may “join” in a family law proceeding. In some specific cases, a third party must “join” the family law proceeding. California codified a third party’s ability to participate in a family law proceeding to assert their interest in real estate by creating…
Continue reading ›While the brief answer is “yes,” the issue is a bit complicated, like many things in the real estate litigation world. Who is a proper party to a partition action? Generally, any person claiming an interest in a piece of real estate must be joined in the action in order to fully settle all issues…
Continue reading ›
