California Partition Law Blog

What are the Benefits of Buying Surplus Land? (Gov. Code § 54225)

Published on: November 13, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

A lawn or vacant lot fronting a big house across.
When there is so much real estate to buy in California, it may not be clear why anyone would benefit from purchasing surplus land in the first instance. After all, it requires going through a negotiation process with a public entity and may take longer than other land purchases. There are some drawbacks to buying “surplus land” from a public entity. The question, then, is whether there are any benefits to buying surplus land.

Are there any ways that buying Surplus Land is beneficial?

Government Code section 54225 provides that any public agency disposing of surplus for “low- and moderate-income housing purposes may provide for a payment period of up to 20 years in any contract of sale or sale by trust deed for the land. The payment period for surplus land disposed of for housing and low- and moderate-income families may exceed 20 years. Still, the payment period shall not exceed the term that the land is required to be used for low- or moderate-income housing.”

Continue reading →

Can You Contest The Title in a Partition Action? (CCP § 872.210)

Published on: November 13, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

A chess board where the king fell down
In many ways, partition actions are relatively straightforward. Generally, in a partition action, the two property owners cannot agree on its use, and one of the owners asks the court to sell the property so each can go their separate ways.

The question arises of whether one of the two persons actually owns the property in the first instance. When there is a question of whether one of the parties is an owner, can you contest the title in a partition action? The answer is “yes,” as one of the primary purposes of a partition action is a determination of title.

Generally, at trial, the court must determine whether the plaintiff has the right to partition. (CCP § 872.210(a).) A question of ownership of property, as presented in a partition action, may be one of fact or law, depending on whether the determination of the issue involves a decision on conflicting facts or the application of the law to a stated set of facts. (Lieb v. Superior Court (1962) 199 Cal.App.2d 364.)

Continue reading →

The Surplus Land Act’s Pre-Negotiation Notice Requirement (Gov. Code § 65088.4)

Published on: November 8, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Aerial image of a wide portion land in a city
The revised Surplus Land Act contains negotiation requirements to encourage the sale of surplus public land. Also, the law makes it more likely that the land will ultimately be developed for as much housing as possible. Prior to entering negotiations, however, AB 1486 requires that the agency selling the surplus land must first give notice.

Government Code section 54222 states that “Any local agency disposing of surplus land shall send, prior to disposing of that property or participating in negotiations to dispose of that property with a prospective transferee, a written notice of availability to all of the following [list of persons]. (emphasis added.)”

By the use of the mandatory term shall, this section mandates notification and therefore ensures that the widest possible array of interested persons will be able to compete to develop the surplus land.

Continue reading →

How Does Accounting Work In A Partition By Division? (CCP § 873.250)

Published on: November 5, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Big house facade with texts place on the image "How does an accounting work in a partition by division?"
When two parties jointly own property but cannot agree on its use, then the sale of the property by a “partition” action is frequently a great remedy to solve the dispute. This tool, however, is not available in all circumstances. While a “partition by sale” makes a lot of sense with regard to a single-family home, it may not make as much sense when the land at issue is vacant undeveloped land. In that instance, a partition by division—the simple division of the property—may be the best outcome for all the parties. A partition by division, however, raises the question of how to account for unequal contributions to the property.

Amounts Paid For Partition Action

Code of Civil Procedure section 873.250 provides that where a division of property cannot be made equally among the parties according to their interests, without prejudice to any party, then compensation may be required to be made by one party to another to correct the inequality. This is commonly called “owelty.”

Continue reading →

What’s the Big Deal with the New Surplus Land Act? (Gov. Code § 54222)

Published on: November 3, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Wide array of land with a stream in the middle.
Everything old is new again. Or so it seems. Sometimes a new thing really is new. In this case, the question is whether the new Surplus Land Act is truly as big of a change as touted. After all, there was a Surplus Land Act before, and there’s a Surplus Land Act now. What’s the big deal?

New Designation Requirements

One small but powerful change is that AB 1486 requires an entity disposing of surplus land to send a notice of availability to the Department of Housing and Community Development (the “Department”) rather than upon written request. This is part of the new “master list” requirements whereby the Department is now required to maintain a master list of available surplus land available. (see Gov. Code § 54222(a)(2).) By requiring each entity to send the information to the Department instead of requiring the Department to request such information, AB 1486 makes it easier for prospective purchasers to understand what is available.

Continue reading →

What is the purpose of the Surplus Land Act? (Gov. Code § 54221)

Published on: November 1, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Landscape image of a wide land in the field
The purpose of this article is to address the goals that California’s Surplus Land Act was designed to accomplish.

The article will address the prior version of the Surplus Land Act, the changes to definitions made in 2019, and provide a big-picture perspective on its aims.

In 2019, the California Legislature re-made the Surplus Land Act in significant ways. Just three of those ways are addressed here.

Continue reading →

How does a 1031 Exchange Work in Eminent Domain? (I.R.C. § 1033)

Published on: October 30, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Aerial view of land as a background image with texts about eminent domain
As if eminent domain is not bad enough, after you’ve gone through the process, the government wants to tax you on the land it made you sell. Savvy property owners, however, can limit their tax liabilities through the use of a 1031 exchange process.

Can a property owner limit the effects of eminent domain?

Internal Revenue Code section 1033 permits the owner of property taken by eminent domain to avoid income tax liability by purchasing qualified replacement property within a specified time following the condemnation.

Continue reading →

Why Don’t Business Owners Receive Compensation Offers in Eminent Domain? (Gov. Code § 7267.1)

Published on: October 29, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Business man handing over an envelopment to another man inside the office
The purpose of this post is to address the process where a governmental entity makes an offer to purchase property in contemplation of the later use of the eminent domain.

This post will address the rule that applies for offers prior to eminent domain, known as “pre-condemnation offers,” address specifics applicable to business, and then contemplate some difficult questions.

Eminent Domain Compensation

Continue reading →

Who is a proper party to a partition action? (CCP § 872.540)

Published on: October 27, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

types of property collage together in one image
The purpose of this post is to discuss who should be part of a partition action. This post will discuss who is typically joined, note some interesting problems, and address how to properly prosecute such an action. After reviewing this article, the reader will be better able to identify who should be named as a party in a partition action.

Partition Action

Generally, as a partition action will cause the sale of the property or otherwise affect the title, it is important to name all persons who have any sort of “interest” in the property. This inquiry generally begins by examining who is listed on the title.

Continue reading →

How Does a Partial Taking Affect My Property Taxes? (Treas. Reg 6 1.10233(a)-2(c)(10)

Published on: October 22, 2021 | By Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Property Tax illustration with a person's hand typing on a laptop
The purpose of this post is to discuss how a partial taking of your property may affect your property taxes.

Often, in an eminent domain action, there are at least two types of damages or payment required. First, the government should pay the property owner for the property actually taken.

Second, when the government takes anything less than the entire parcel, the government should also pay the property owner for any damages caused to the property left-over.

Continue reading →