California Partition Law Blog
An Assembly bill applying to decedents’ estates was finalized on August 29, 2024. The bill will amend six sections of the Probate Code (Cal. Prob. Code § 13100-13101, 13150-13152, 13154) and repeal one section (Prob. Code § 13158). This is significant because it impacts how successors of decedents can manage a decedent’s real property.
Specifically, this means real property in estates valued over $750,000, or that was not the primary residence, can no longer take advantage of this expedited process.
Generally, it takes a long time for an estate to go through probate, so this section of the code is meant to facilitate the distribution and disposal of certain types of property in the estate. Normally an estate goes through administration proceedings and to state a claim as a beneficiary that person needs to file a petition. (Prob. Code § 11700-11701.) The petitioning person has to notify the other settled heirs and beneficiaries who can fight the petition. (Prob. Code § 1220.) Because of these lengthy and expensive disputes, estates under a certain value were made exempt from the estate administration process. (Bucholtz v. Belshe (9th Cir. 1997) 114 F.3d 923, 927.) Currently, sections of the Probate Code allow property in an estate under a certain value to be disposed of by a successor. Once this new bill is enacted it will limit the exemption to which the property applies.
In recent years, the growth of vacation rentals have driven the rise of purchasing investment properties in highly desirable areas throughout the country. For years, investment rentals were so profitable that many people jumped into the market and purchased properties to get a piece of the action. Unfortunately, in recent years, the sheer number of vacation rentals in these areas diluted the marketplace and made it increasingly more difficult to turn a profit from these investments, and in some cases, have lead to investment losses.
Generally, an owner can never legally “abandon” title to property. (Gerhard v. Stephens (1968) 442 P.2d 692, 713.) Instead, abandonment can only be found in situations dealing with personal property. Yet when the property interests in real property are in the nature of incorporeal hereditaments, the California Supreme Court has found that those interests can be abandoned.
What is an Ouster (Civ. Code § 843)?
Generally, when obtaining representation for yourself and your property interests, you must make sure that your interests are indeed being protected and your wishes respected as much as legally possible. The moment it becomes clear that your attorney is not acting accordingly, it may be time to change your lawyer.
The California Partition Law begins at Code of Civil Procedure section 872.010 and ends at Code of Civil Procedure section 874.323. Section 872.250 outlines the procedure for a plaintiff seeking a partition of real property to record a lis pendens with the county office. 
If you’re venturing into a real estate transaction and are daunted by the contracts, you’re certainly not alone. The jargon and intricate legal parlance can often make these contracts seem more complex than they actually are. Yet, the good news is that, armed with some guidance and understanding, these contracts become much less intimidating. Our friends at 
Generally, the seller of a home has disclosures that they are required by law to make to any prospective buyer. This also applies to the 
Oftentimes, the government will announce a public project which may affect the neighboring property’s value. Most of the time, the public project should increase the property’s value. Sometimes though, the announced public project may decrease the property’s value, which may make it difficult to rent the property. When that happens, the property owner may be able to sue for what is known as “Klopping damages”. This allows the owner to recover lost rental income due to the decrease in value from a public project.