Articles Posted in Tag: tenant rights

What are the tax implications when one co-owner sells to another (Rev. & Tax. Code § 62)?
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

There are two common ways an individual can own property: (1) as a tenant in common or (2) as a joint tenant. In California, there is a presumption that the co-owners of a piece of property are tenants in common unless the deed expressly states that the co-owners are joint tenants. In a joint...

Continue reading ›
What can you do when a co-owner refuses to pay taxes (CCP § 872.140)?
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

In every property co-owned by two or more persons, there are common costs. Common costs are those costs for the property that are common to all owners or for the common benefit of all owners. In California, cotenants are required to pay for their portion of the common costs. Therefore, cotenants must pay for...

Continue reading ›
What is a Trust (Boshernitsan v. Bach (2021 61 Cal.App.5th 883)?
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

“A trust is any arrangement which exists whereby property is transferred with an intention that it be held and administered by the transferee for the benefit of another.” (Higgins v. Higgins (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 648, 662.) Essentially, a trust is a legal relationship that allows a person to hold property for the benefit of...

Continue reading ›
Is a Partition Action Exempt from Bankruptcy Proceedings (CCP § 715.050)?
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Generally, a bankruptcy proceeding acts as a stay on the collection of debt as well as any acts needed to be taken to enforce a debt. The rules regarding partition actions in bankruptcy proceedings are codified in the Code of Civil Procedure section 715.050. Typically, whether a partition action is exempt from a bankruptcy...

Continue reading ›
What is a Prejudgment Claim to Right of Possession (CCP § 415.46)?
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

A Prejudgment Claim to Right of Possession is a form used for the purpose of avoiding third-party claims in an eviction/unlawful detainer action. The Prejudgment Claim to Right Possession is for the purpose of giving notice to any unnamed occupants of a subject property that an eviction action has been initiated. After a prejudgment...

Continue reading ›
What is Adverse Possession (CCP § 323)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

In California, a person can claim title to a piece of real property that they are not a titleholder to through adverse possession. Adverse possession requires a person to be in use of a particular piece of real property for the required statutory period. An adverse possessor, however, does not become the titleholder of...

Continue reading ›
Are Tenant-in-Common Agreements Constitutional? (Tom v. City and County of San Francisco (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 674.)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Co-ownership of property brings with it many rights and duties under the law. These rights and duties can vary depending on whether co-owners hold property as tenants in common or joint tenants; these are the two most popular forms of joint ownership in the state. Regardless of the ownership scheme, however, both forms of...

Continue reading ›
What is the Partition of Real Property Act? (CCP § 874.316)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

The Partition of Real Property Act (PRPA) is an exciting new development in real estate law only recently passed by the California Legislature. Its effects are far-reaching, and its changes to the procedure for partitions cannot be understated. At Underwood Law Firm, our attorneys are more than familiar with partitions and the complexities such...

Continue reading ›
What are the historical origins of joint-tenancies and tenancies-in-common? (Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

American law has its roots in the laws of England. As such, many of the laws still on the books in the 21st Century depend on what English judges thought prior to our War for Independence began in 1776. Because our modern laws go back centuries since before the United States was a country,...

Continue reading ›
Can you partition a life estate? (CCP § 872.710)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Yes. When co-owners of property decide they want to go their separate ways but cannot come to an agreement on a buyout or reimbursements, they can institute a partition action and have the court system solve the problem for them. The presence of a life estate, however, substantially complicates this process. Additional evidentiary showings...

Continue reading ›
What is a Claim for Waste in California? (Civ. Code § 818)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

A “waste” claim is a means of recovering damages when a tenant on real property does substantial damage to the property itself. Most often, a waste claim arises when a person renting property causes damage while living there. But a waste claim isn’t restricted to landlords and tenants. It applies to nearly all situations...

Continue reading ›
What is an Elisor? (Corp. Code § 128(4))
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Just because a party prevails in a lawsuit does not mean the matter is over. Rarely discussed but crucially important is the fact that a judgment must be enforced once it is entered. This isn’t always easy. Losing parties don’t always want to cooperate, especially when they’re operating without an attorney. Sometimes, a party...

Continue reading ›
How do you partition a condominium? (CCP § 872.820)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

When co-owners of property decide they want to go their separate ways but cannot come to an agreement on a buyout or reimbursements, they can institute a partition action and have the court system solve the problem. While partition actions usually involve homes or commercial properties, they can also involve condominiums. Condos bring with...

Continue reading ›
Can an ousted cotenant recover possession of the property? (Civ. Code § 843)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Yes. Co-owners of property are entitled to certain rights, namely, the right to possess and use the property as they see fit. But sometimes, things do not work out with the other owners. Heirs to an estate can bicker, business relationships can fall through, and family dynamics can fall apart. This may result in...

Continue reading ›
Does RUPA apply to joint ventures? (Corp. Code § 16101)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

Yes. While joint ventures are a distinct type of business entity, they share many similarities with general partnerships in California. In fact, “the resemblance between a partnership and joint venture is so close that the rights as between adventurers are governed by practically the same rules that govern partners.” (Milton Kauffman, Inc. v. Superior...

Continue reading ›
What is the difference Between Tenants in Common and Joint Tenants? (Code of Civil Procedure section 683)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

In California, most real estate is held either as marital property, as a tenancy in partnership, as joint tenants, or as tenants-in-common. While holding titles as spouses or in a partnership is relatively straightforward, questions frequently arise as to the differences between “co-tenants” and “tenants-in-common.” This article will explore the difference between the second...

Continue reading ›
Can Rent Control Laws Prevent a Partition Eviction? (Civ. Code § 1632)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

No, rent control laws cannot prevent a partition eviction. However, the answer is a bit more complicated than one might think. There are very specific rules and regulations in California that regulate both rent control laws and partition action evictions. Read on to learn more. What is Rent Control? While the benefits of rent...

Continue reading ›
What Is a Partition Agreement? (CCP § 872.710)
Underwood Law Firm, P.C.

One reason partition actions are a good option is that there is generally an absolute right to partition, but every rule has exceptions. In a partition action, the main exception is when the parties have executed a partition agreement. Generally, the right to partition can be waived by an express—or implied—an agreement between co-tenants....

Continue reading ›

Search

Client Reviews

  • We were in need of a real estate attorney. Eli Underwood provided excellent legal advice and services. He explained everything well and followed through with all important issues that needed attention. We found him to be reliable, courteous, patient and extremely professional. We highly recommend...

    I.S.

  • I own a real estate investment company that operates across multiple states (California, Washington, Oregon, Montana, and more), whenever I run into an issue that needs legal attention, Eli is my first call. I've been working with him for years. He is an amazing attorney and I highly recommend him."...

    T.W.

  • Mr. Underwood is a fantastic Lawyer with extraordinary ethics. He responds quickly, which is rare these days, and he is very knowledgeable in his craft. It was a pleasure working with him and we will definitely use his services in the future if needed. Thank you for your help Sir!

    M.O.

  • Eli took our case and controlled every hurdle put before us. I one time commented to him that he must love his job because it seemed that he was always available. When talking about my case to anyone I always bring up where, I believe, the other parties Lawyer tried to take advantage of my wife and...

    E.T

  • We were in need of an attorney with considerable knowledge of real estate law and the legal issues related to property ownership. Eli Underwood went above and beyond our expectations. In keeping us abreast of our suit, his communication skills were outstanding. This talent was especially...

    P.B.

  • In our need for legal services we found Eli to be well informed and on top of our case and our needs. Our's was not an ordinary case as it was a case with many facets. It was a very convoluted case. There were multiple owners involved in a property dispute where one of the owners sued the rest of...

    M.A.

View MoreSubmit a Law Firm Client Review