super lawyers logo
avvo clients choice logo
Association-5
lawyers of distinction logo
expertise.com logo
Association-7

What is a Civil Harassment Restraining Order? (Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6)

Underwood Law Firm, P.C.
332023 300x300 1

A Civil Harassment Restraining Order is a type of restraining order used in California to stop a person from harassing or threatening another. However, the requirements for a civil harassment restraining order are slightly different than a typical restraining order. Essentially, a civil harassment restraining order is for the purpose of providing protection to a person that is the subject of harassment from someone they do or do not have a relationship with. Therefore, a civil harassment restraining order provides a legal intervention that restrains the harasser.

However, that a special relationship does not need to be shown to obtain a civil harassment restraining order does not mean that a person can get such a restraining order against anyone. A litigant seeking a civil harassment restraining order is required to show proof of behavior that constitutes harassment.

At Underwood Law Firm, our attorneys are more than familiar with civil harassment restraining orders.

Code of Civil Procedure 527.6

The requirements for a civil harassment restraining order are codified in the Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6. Under section 527.6, a party seeking a civil harassment restraining order must show that either a credible threat of violence or harassment exists. (CCP § 527.6.) Section 527.6 defines a credible threat of violence as knowing or willful behavior that serves no legitimate purpose and would place a reasonable person in fear for the person’s safety or the safety of the person’s immediate family. (CCP § 527.6(b)(2).) Harassment is defined as “unlawful violence, a credible threat of violence or a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, or harasses the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct must be that which would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to the petitioner.” (CCP § 527.6(b)(3).) Unlawful violence constitutes any assault, battery, or stalking. (CCP § 527.6(b)(7).)

It is important to note, however, that such behavior cannot be a mere instance of harassment. Section 527.6 requires that the behavior constituting harassment be a pattern of conduct/series of acts. (CCP § 527.6(b)(1).) For example, “Shawn” and “Julie” dated for four months before Julie decided she needed to take a break from the relationship. One week after they broke up, Shawn called Julie through an unknown number, threatening to hurt her. The calls continued, and eventually, Shawn would call Julie every few days, threatening her life. Julie now has extreme anxiety. Julie sleeps with a knife under her pillow and asks her brother and friends to accompany her every time she needs to leave the house. Most nights, Julie cannot sleep through the night in fear that Shawn will break into her house. In this instance, Julie would be able to get a civil harassment restraining order because Shawn’s phone calls were not a one-time act, and Julie has suffered severe emotional distress.

Conduct that Serves a Legitimate Purpose

As set forth in section 527.6, the alleged harassment or credible threat of violence must not serve a legitimate purpose. Therefore, if the conduct being complained of is conduct that does actually serve a legitimate purpose, then it is not harassment or a credible threat of violence pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6. For example, in Byers v. Cathcart (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 805, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 398, an adjacent homeowner filed an application for an antiharassment injunction against a homeowner who had an easement to use the adjacent homeowner’s driveway. There, the trial court granted the restraining order. (Id.) The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s holding granting the restraining order to prevent the homeowner from parking the car according to the easement. (Id.) The Court of Appeals reasoned that parking a car is not conduct that has no legitimate purpose, nor was the parking specifically done to annoy the adjacent homeowner. (Id. at 807)

Ex Parte Application

A civil harassment restraining order is a type of temporary restraining order. Typically, when applying for a temporary restraining order, a litigant must give notice to the other party of the temporary restraining order. However, a temporary restraining order may be granted without notice or ex parte. To get a civil harassment restraining order ex parte, a person must show that in addition to the harassment, they will suffer irreparable harm without the civil harassment restraining order. (CCP § 527.6(d).)

Modification of a Civil Harassment Restraining Order

Either party to a civil harassment restraining order may bring a motion to modify or terminate said restraining order. (Yost v. Forestiere (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 509, 522, 265 Cal.Rptr.3d 175.) Under section 527.6, within the discretion of the court, a civil harassment restraining order may not have a duration of more than five years and is subject to termination or modification by further order of the court. (CCP § 527.6(j)(1).) Therefore, modifications to a civil harassment restraining order are discretionary. (Yost, 51 Cal.App.5th 509, 522.) Further, under Code of Civil Procedure section 533, a court may modify or terminate a civil harassment restraining order when there has been a material change in the facts for which the restraining order was granted. (CCP § 533.) Section 533 gives three bases upon which a civil harassment restraining order may be modified/terminated: served by a modification or termination. (Id.)

How Can the Attorneys at the Underwood Law Firm Assist You?

A civil harassment restraining order is a temporary restraining order prohibiting harassment against a person who has suffered from said harassment. For a person to obtain a civil harassment restraining order, they must show evidence of a credible threat of violence or harassment. Also, such conduct has to be a series of acts and not just a mere instance of harassment. As each case is unique, litigants would be well-served to seek experienced counsel familiar with the ins and outs of civil harassment restraining orders and the law surrounding them. At the Underwood Law Firm, our knowledgeable attorneys are here to help. If you believe you need a civil harassment restraining order, are worried about your ability to get a civil harassment restraining order, or if you just have questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Eli Underwood Eli Underwood

Founder & Managing Attorney
Elijah “Eli” Underwood is the founder and managing attorney of Underwood Law Firm, P.C., a California law firm focused on partition actions and real estate co-ownership disputes.
Since founding Underwood Law Firm in 2021, Eli has built a practice dedicated to helping property owners navigate complex disputes involving jointly owned real estate. The firm has handled more than 500 partition matters throughout California, giving Eli extensive experience in this highly specialized area of real estate law.
Eli has practiced law in California since 2009 and brings the perspective of both an experienced litigator and a real estate investor. His litigation experience includes jury and bench trial victories, representation of high-profile clients, including members of Congress, and legal work that has contributed to developments in California law.
Recognized for his knowledge of partition and co-ownership law, Eli serves on the Executive Committee of the California Lawyers Association Real Property Law Section. He is also an instructor on Partitions and Co-Ownership Relationships for the California Association of REALTORS® and regularly speaks to legal and professional organizations on partition law and real estate disputes.
Eli earned his J.D. from UC Hastings College of the Law, now UC Law San Francisco, in 2009 and his B.A. from UC Santa Barbara in 2005. During law school, he served on the board of the Negotiation Team and competed in national and international negotiation competitions.
His legal insight has been featured in television and print media, and he continues to contribute to the legal community through education, speaking engagements, and professional leadership.
Education
J.D., UC Hastings College of the Law (UC Law San Francisco), 2009
B.A., University of California, Santa Barbara, 2005
Bar Admission
State Bar of California, 2009
Professional Leadership & Education
Executive Committee, California Lawyers Association Real Property Law Section
Instructor, Partitions and Co-Ownership Relationships, California Association of REALTORS®
Speaker and educator on California partition and real estate co-ownership law

View Author Profile

Search

Client Reviews

  • 5 stars
    We were in need of a real estate attorney. Eli Underwood provided excellent legal advice and services. He explained everything well and followed through with all important issues that needed attention. We found him to be reliable, courteous, patient and extremely professional. We highly recommend...

    I.S.

  • 5 stars
    I own a real estate investment company that operates across multiple states (California, Washington, Oregon, Montana, and more), whenever I run into an issue that needs legal attention, Eli is my first call. I've been working with him for years. He is an amazing attorney and I highly recommend him."...

    T.W.

  • 5 stars
    Mr. Underwood is a fantastic Lawyer with extraordinary ethics. He responds quickly, which is rare these days, and he is very knowledgeable in his craft. It was a pleasure working with him and we will definitely use his services in the future if needed. Thank you for your help Sir!

    M.O.

  • 5 stars
    Eli took our case and controlled every hurdle put before us. I one time commented to him that he must love his job because it seemed that he was always available. When talking about my case to anyone I always bring up where, I believe, the other parties Lawyer tried to take advantage of my wife and...

    E.T

  • 5 stars
    We were in need of an attorney with considerable knowledge of real estate law and the legal issues related to property ownership. Eli Underwood went above and beyond our expectations. In keeping us abreast of our suit, his communication skills were outstanding. This talent was especially...

    P.B.

  • 5 stars
    In our need for legal services we found Eli to be well informed and on top of our case and our needs. Our's was not an ordinary case as it was a case with many facets. It was a very convoluted case. There were multiple owners involved in a property dispute where one of the owners sued the rest of...

    M.A.

View MoreSubmit a Law Firm Client Review