super lawyers logo
avvo clients choice logo
Association-5
lawyers of distinction logo
expertise.com logo
Association-7

What are the steps to dissolve a partnership (Corp. Code § 16801)?

Underwood Law Firm, P.C.
2172023 300x300 1

Partnerships are incredibly common business entities that many Californians enter on a regular basis, often to acquire and develop real estate over many years. But even the most successful arrangements must come to an end. Unfortunately, more often than not, the dissolution procedures “unwind” what may have been a series of cordial and respectful relationships between all involved. At Underwood Law firm, our attorneys know how tough this situation can be. Thankfully, our attorneys are well-versed in partnership law, and we know the best ways to tackle the disputes that accompany dissolution and winding up. Our team has the legal acumen and skills necessary to help you achieve your litigation goals.

When can a partnership be dissolved?

Technically, a partnership can be dissolved at any time. That said, there are certain circumstances where the law says that the partnership must begin winding up its affairs. The Corporations Code contains an itemized list of scenarios where this is proper. (Corp. Code § 16801.) The first and most obvious is when the partners want to end their relationship. The rule here varies depending on whether the partnership is “at will” or defined for a specific term or undertaking. An “at will” partnership has no fixed time for its duration, meaning it can end whenever the partners want it to. (Corp. Code § 16101.) For these types of partnerships, all it takes is for at least half of all the partners to want out. (Corp. Code § 16801.) On the other hand, there are partnerships for definite terms or undertakings. These are partnerships formed to achieve some specific goal or to last for a stated amount of time. Naturally, one way that the partnership can end is if the undertaking is completed or the time limit is reached. But if the partners want to wind up the entity early, then all partners need to agree, not just half. (Corp. Code § 16801.) There are, however, many other instances where the law mandates a partnership dissolve. For example, a set action or event can occur that the partnership agreement states results in dissolution. Or imagine an ordinance is passed that makes the goods the partnership is making illegal. This, too, mandates an end to the partnership. Even a single partner can end a partnership, provided they file a special application in court. These applications, though, require the partner to make definite showings in order to be successful. Some common reasons are that it is not reasonably practical to continue carrying on the partnership or that the economic purpose of the partnership is unreasonably frustrated. (Navarro v. Perron (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 797, 801.)

Can a partnership continue even though it should be dissolved?

Yes, though only in certain situations. Suppose that a partnership is set to last for 20 years so that the partners can invest in and develop a piece of real estate. The 20-year clock is up, so that means the partnership begins winding up, right? In actuality, the Corporations Code dictates that all of the partners can waive the right to wind up the partnership. (Corp. Code § 16802.) In this event, the partnership resumes carrying on its business as if dissolution never occurred, and any liability incurred by the partnership after dissolution is determined as if the dissolution had not occurred. (Id.) This situation actually occurs quite frequently. If things are going well, and the partnership is benefitting the partners economically, then there isn’t an incentive to wind up and end the entity’s existence. This waiver, therefore, provides partners with the flexibility to fully take their situations into account.

What is mean to “wind up” a partnership?

Let’s say that the partners don’t want anything to do with a waiver and instead truly want their mutual relationship to end. In that case, the partnership is not technically dissolved yet. It still has to be wound up. Winding up means settling the accounts and business of the partnership. Typically, this entails liquidating the partnership’s assets and squaring away each partner’s partnership account. It can also mean paying off creditors, transferring any property to third parties or into trust, and discharging the partnership’s liabilities. While all this is going on, the partnership is still, technically, “alive.” (Corp. Code § 16803.) This is because, in addition to settling the accounts, the partnership has to be able to sue and be sued. Suppose that the partnership engaged in some improper activity while it was active and now is being dissolved due in part to the bad actions of some partners. Those injured parties will want to come collecting, and the partnership needs to be able to account for third-party claims, even if they’re brought after dissolution is started. Put another way, when a partnership is dissolved, the dissolution “is best understood not as its death, but merely as its retirement from business activities.” (Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1180, 1190.)

Can partners dissociate during a wind up?

Dissociation needs to be distinguished from dissolution. Dissociation refers to when a partner individually leaves the partnership early. There are advantages and disadvantages to this. On the one hand, the Corporations Code provides that when a partner dissociates, this triggers a statutory buyout of their interest in the firm. (Corp. Code § 16701.) That said, dissociation can be “wrongful” in certain instances, and leaving early can result in the withdrawing partner being sued for damages. It’s a risky gamble. But once a partnership is dissolved, can the partners dissociate to trigger their own buyouts? No. The rule is that if a partner dissociates 90 days or less before dissolution, they are treated as a partner for the purposes of winding up the business. (Corp. Code § 16701.5) This statute thus prevents partners from racing to get out early in anticipation of dissolution so that they can try to avoid the costs of discharging partnership obligations with partnership assets, including their own individual contributions. Once a dissolution is started, partners cannot simply get out until the entity is completely wound up.

How can the attorneys at Underwood Law Firm assist you?

Winding up a partnership can prove to be a difficult task. Some partners will inevitably wish for the relationship to continue, while others may only be looking out for themselves. In these situations, the right attorney can make all the difference. As each case is unique, partners would be well-served to seek experienced counsel familiar with partnerships and the winding up procedure. At Underwood Law, our knowledgeable attorneys are here to help. If you are trying to begin dissolution, wondering whether you can fight one off, or if you just have questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Learn more here.

Eli Underwood Eli Underwood

Founder & Managing Attorney
Elijah “Eli” Underwood is the founder and managing attorney of Underwood Law Firm, P.C., a California law firm focused on partition actions and real estate co-ownership disputes.
Since founding Underwood Law Firm in 2021, Eli has built a practice dedicated to helping property owners navigate complex disputes involving jointly owned real estate. The firm has handled more than 500 partition matters throughout California, giving Eli extensive experience in this highly specialized area of real estate law.
Eli has practiced law in California since 2009 and brings the perspective of both an experienced litigator and a real estate investor. His litigation experience includes jury and bench trial victories, representation of high-profile clients, including members of Congress, and legal work that has contributed to developments in California law.
Recognized for his knowledge of partition and co-ownership law, Eli serves on the Executive Committee of the California Lawyers Association Real Property Law Section. He is also an instructor on Partitions and Co-Ownership Relationships for the California Association of REALTORS® and regularly speaks to legal and professional organizations on partition law and real estate disputes.
Eli earned his J.D. from UC Hastings College of the Law, now UC Law San Francisco, in 2009 and his B.A. from UC Santa Barbara in 2005. During law school, he served on the board of the Negotiation Team and competed in national and international negotiation competitions.
His legal insight has been featured in television and print media, and he continues to contribute to the legal community through education, speaking engagements, and professional leadership.
Education
J.D., UC Hastings College of the Law (UC Law San Francisco), 2009
B.A., University of California, Santa Barbara, 2005
Bar Admission
State Bar of California, 2009
Professional Leadership & Education
Executive Committee, California Lawyers Association Real Property Law Section
Instructor, Partitions and Co-Ownership Relationships, California Association of REALTORS®
Speaker and educator on California partition and real estate co-ownership law

View Author Profile

Search

Client Reviews

  • 5 stars
    We were in need of a real estate attorney. Eli Underwood provided excellent legal advice and services. He explained everything well and followed through with all important issues that needed attention. We found him to be reliable, courteous, patient and extremely professional. We highly recommend...

    I.S.

  • 5 stars
    I own a real estate investment company that operates across multiple states (California, Washington, Oregon, Montana, and more), whenever I run into an issue that needs legal attention, Eli is my first call. I've been working with him for years. He is an amazing attorney and I highly recommend him."...

    T.W.

  • 5 stars
    Mr. Underwood is a fantastic Lawyer with extraordinary ethics. He responds quickly, which is rare these days, and he is very knowledgeable in his craft. It was a pleasure working with him and we will definitely use his services in the future if needed. Thank you for your help Sir!

    M.O.

  • 5 stars
    Eli took our case and controlled every hurdle put before us. I one time commented to him that he must love his job because it seemed that he was always available. When talking about my case to anyone I always bring up where, I believe, the other parties Lawyer tried to take advantage of my wife and...

    E.T

  • 5 stars
    We were in need of an attorney with considerable knowledge of real estate law and the legal issues related to property ownership. Eli Underwood went above and beyond our expectations. In keeping us abreast of our suit, his communication skills were outstanding. This talent was especially...

    P.B.

  • 5 stars
    In our need for legal services we found Eli to be well informed and on top of our case and our needs. Our's was not an ordinary case as it was a case with many facets. It was a very convoluted case. There were multiple owners involved in a property dispute where one of the owners sued the rest of...

    M.A.

View MoreSubmit a Law Firm Client Review